| 논문명 | 실내디자인과 건축학의 프로페션화에 나타나는 특성 비교/미국 실내디자인과 건축학의 교육인증기준에 나타난 전문지식영역 비교/Comparative study on the characteristics of professionalization between interior design and architecture - Comparison of the body of knowledge shown in the accrediting criteria of interior design and architecture education in the United States - |
|---|---|
| 저자명 | 이종희 ; 김덕수 |
| 발행사 | 한국실내디자인학회 |
| 수록사항 | 한국실내디자인학회 논문집 , v.23 n.2(통권 103호) |
| 페이지 | 시작페이지(125) 총페이지(11) |
| ISSN | 12297992 |
| 주제분류 | 계획및설계 |
| 주제어 | 지식영역 ; 인증기준 ; 프로페션화 Knowledge Area ; Accrediting Criteria ; Professionalization |
| 요약2 | Professionalization of Korean interior design is not completed, considering the fact that accreditation and registration systems cannot be found in it. This study, initiated with this concern, analyzed the knowledge area of interior design and architecture in the United States while utilizing accreditation standards of CIDA and NAAB. The purpose of this study is to provide reference to consult for the professionalization of Korean interior design by showing the effects of standardized professional knowledge on professionalization. The utilized research method is a multiple case study, analyzing cases of interior design and architecture in the United States. The unit of analysis is accrediting criteria, including present and revised versions. Content analysis was conducted to interpretate qualitative data collected. The research results include that knowledge differences between interior design and architecture are not clear. This study concludes that standardized professional knowledge emphasizes the technicality elements of knowledge to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public instead of indeterminacy elements. The research results imply that knowledge standardization concerning HSW can be a critical step to professionalization because it can show a jurisdictional boundary as a unique profession. |
| 소장처 | 한국실내디자인학회 |