| 논문명 | 한국의 현대 실내공간에 나타난 한국적 조형의식에 관한 연구/The Study on the Korean Plastic Consciousness of the Contemporary Interior Space in Korea |
|---|---|
| 저자명 | 오인욱 |
| 발행사 | 한국실내디자인학회 |
| 수록사항 | 한국실내디자인학회 논문집 , v.13 n.5(통권 46호) |
| 페이지 | 시작페이지(74) 총페이지(8) |
| ISSN | 12297992 |
| 주제분류 | 계획및설계 |
| 주제어 | 한국적 조형 의식 ; 정체성 ; 의식주 공간 |
| 요약1 | 의식주라는 인간 생활의 기본적인 세 가지(의식주) 요소의 변화와 각각의 내용이 공간적으로 수용될 때 보여지는 시각적 특성들의 변화, 그리고 전통과 현대적 조형의식의 비교 고찰을 통한 한국적 조형의식에 대한 분석을 함으로써 전통과 현대에 대한 이분법적 구분에 연결 고리를 마련하는 단초를 제공하고, 한국적 조형의식이라는 개념을 현대 디자인의 영역에서 현대적으로 적용 또는 발전시킬 수 있는 방안을 모색해 보고자 하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. |
| 요약2 | The three basic elements of human life -clothing, food and shelter- had been evolved through different periods and cultural realms, as their spatial applications show distinct characteristics that are manifested through sensibilities only inherent to its specific culture. Especially in the interior spaces, possibilities to approach them in three-dimensional aspects allow formal characteristics to be expressed that are distinct to the country. Formal sensibilities embedded in interior space in Korea also follows such pattern, developed through various contemporary interpretations of Korean traditional formal sensibilities, including harmony with nature, simplicity, lightness, real and fake, and principle of harmony are being redefined by spatially expressed in contemporary language. That is, traditional formal sensibilitiesare filtered through various application methods such as composition, negotiation and modification, accommodating spatial manifestations to be not simply preserved nor replicated, but rather reconstructed through metaphor, symbol, abstraction and contrast. From this perspective, the Korean traditional formal sensibilitiesis not a notion fixed in the past, but a distinct perspectives evolving throughout periods of time that are constantly reconsidered and reinterpreted in our interior space. By examining Korean sensibilities manifested in interior space in the both diachronic aspects of tradition vs. contemporary, as well as synchronic aspects among various disciplines simultaneously, we would be able to generate a linkage to the dichotomous categories of tradition and contemporary. |